← Search

EDWARD CHOI

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westminster, CA
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
194 matches · 129W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history194 matches
L
2026-08-02 · OC Los Cab - Julie · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sabrina MacLachlan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · OC LNRC - Avi - Sun1 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Brendan Duda
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-05-03 · OC LNRC - Avi - Sun1 · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
Alejandro Vigil De Ovando
2026-05-02 · Singles · with Edward Choi tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
Edward Choi
2026-05-02 · Singles · with Pramit Choudhary tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-03-22 · LA LLW Racquet Scientists - Andrew Clayton · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Hans Hettich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-03-14 · LA LLW Racquet Scientists - Andrew Clayton · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Michael Ortiz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-07 · OC LPC - Akhi/Nisha - Sun3 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sabrina MacLachlan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
Default
2026-02-28 · LA LLW Racquet Scientists - Andrew Clayton · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Eugene Tran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-14 · OC LPC - Akhi/Nisha - Sun3 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sabrina MacLachlan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-02-07 · OC LPC - Akhi/Nisha - Sun3 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michele Savoie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-01-25 · LA LLW Racquet Scientists - Andrew Clayton · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Eugene Tran
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 78.5% of games
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 67% of games
4.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 68.8% of games
4.5
67.5%
52W–25L · 57.8% of games
5.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 46.4% of games
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 81.7% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57% of games
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
93.8%
15W–1L · 73.9% of games
9.0mixed
76.9%
20W–6L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
29 matches
Singles
11%
21 matches
#1 Singles
6%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams