← Search

Erica Shookman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Green Bay, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 140W–59L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history199 matches
W
2026-11-01 · 2026 WI Combo 6.5 W NEL Western Jonen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Wick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-11-01 · 2026 WI Combo 6.5 W NEL Western Jonen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Wick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Default
2026-08-02 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL PioneerPark Jonen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Terry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-02 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL PioneerPark Jonen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Terry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-29 · WI Adult 18&Over 3.5 Women NEL GBTC Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Grunwald
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 NEL Pioneer Park Palasota · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Blaine Springer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL PioneerPark Jonen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Wiesner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · WI Adult 18&Over 3.5 Women NEL GBTC Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Grunwald
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL PioneerPark Jonen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Wiesner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · WI Adult 18&Over 3.5 Women NEL GBTC Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Grunwald
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · WI Adult 18&Over 3.5 Women NEL GBTC Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Grunwald
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · WI Adult 18&Over 3.5 Women NEL GBTC Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Grunwald
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
94.7%
18W–1L · 62.2% of games
3.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 63.4% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.7% of games
6.5
71.7%
38W–15L · 62.1% of games
7.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 52.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 51.9% of games
6.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 65.5% of games
7.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 53.4% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
52 matches
#1 Singles
8%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams