← Search

Felicia Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Louisville, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
322 matches · 239W–83L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history322 matches
W
2026-10-25 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Smith
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Smith championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Dahlem championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Smith championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-30 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melody Medley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Mitchell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-08 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melody Medley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3
L
2026-08-06 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Troy Fontana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-03 · KY/LOU/OConnell/Voss · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Smith
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Stanchin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josiah Wall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-24 · Bruneau/Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sean Bolen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams100 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 68% of games
3.0
72.7%
32W–12L · 63.5% of games
3.5
82.3%
51W–11L · 63.5% of games
4.0
73.1%
68W–25L · 59.2% of games
4.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 51.4% of games
5.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 65.8% of games
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 61.4% of games
7.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 61.9% of games
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.9% of games
3.5mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 67.1% of games
4.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.6% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.5% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 55% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
135 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
111 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
59 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova