← Search

Naveen Sharma

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 161W–95L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history256 matches
L
2026-10-01 · RGogate (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-29 · RGogate (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with NARAYANA REDDY Nalamalpu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-03 · RGogate (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leonard Evansek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-27 · RGogate (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Weigel mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Gibson championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Gibson championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Malseed championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Malseed championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · MCTA 4.0M 40 & Over (Weigel) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Schroeder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
Default
2026-06-03 · MCTA 4.0M 40 & Over (Weigel) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Beierwaltes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Malseed championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
84%
21W–4L · 59.3% of games
4.0
54.8%
51W–42L · 51.6% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 53.6% of games
7.5
66%
31W–16L · 53.9% of games
8.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.5% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 36.6% of games
4.0mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.8% of games
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
85.7%
18W–3L · 58.3% of games
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
46 matches
#1 Singles
13%
32 matches
#2 Singles
7%
19 matches
#3 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams