← Search

Roy Cobean

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Falmouth, ME
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 17W–25L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history42 matches
W
2026-08-16 · OP:MainelyOldGuys:Shumway · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Kendall
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · OP:MainelyOldGuys:Shumway · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Kendall
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-03-07 · WOOD:Woodies:Wignall · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dave Rowland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-25 · WOOD:Woodies:Wignall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Simon Wignall
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-24 · WOOD:Let'sGo:Adey · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Whipple
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-11 · WOOD:Let'sGo:Adey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Nicholson
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-11 · WOOD:Let'sGo:Adey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Subrata Das
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-10 · WOOD:Woodies:Wignall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dave Rowland
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-10 · WOOD:Woodies:Wignall · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alan Wolf
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-08-10 · OP:MainelyOldGuys:Shumway · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Gagne
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-13 · OP:MainelyOldGuys:Shumway · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Barrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-05-06 · WOOD:Let'sGo:Adey:Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brett Stillman
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 47.5% of games
3.5
18.8%
3W–13L · 34.3% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 43.1% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal