← Search

Jim Kennedy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Concord, NH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 35W–51L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history86 matches
L
2026-10-31 · BOSS:Stan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Bennett
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-24 · BOSS:Stan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alden Smith
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-09-13 · BOSS:Stan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christian Durgin
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · BB:Kennedy:Lewis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Lewis
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · MTS:Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christian Durgin
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · MTS:Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard King
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · MTS:Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Soffron
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-28 · MTS:King · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Bennett
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
Default
2026-03-21 · MTS:Kennedy · #2 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-15 · MTS:ChucklesAndChugs:King:Joslin-King · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirsten Ininger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-07 · MTS:Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Soffron
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-01 · MTS:King · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Bennett
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
39.5%
30W–46L · 48% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova