← Search

Bridget van Dyke

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alpharetta, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 75W–27L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history102 matches
W
2025-01-15 · Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Iulia Harper
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-01-04 · Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandi Dickson
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-12-14 · Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Iulia Harper
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-12-07 · Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandi Dickson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-11-23 · Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandi Dickson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-11-16 · Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandi Dickson
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-11-09 · Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Coyle
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-25 · Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Petrocco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-10-18 · Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy O'Shea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-09-27 · Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy O'Shea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-04-26 · Hampshires (Cecily Hamilton)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy O'Shea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Stephens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70%
35W–15L · 60.7% of games
4.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 57.8% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.3% of games
6.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 61.6% of games
7.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 71% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
40 matches
#1 Singles
24%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
15 matches
#2 Singles
12%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer