← Search

Nicole Jordan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
312 matches · 179W–133L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history312 matches
L
2026-09-02 · HMC - Richards/Bowden · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brantley Bowden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · Highland - Shea/Reidinger · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kirstie Ivey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · Hoover Met - Jordan · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Layna Orise
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · HMC - Richards/Bowden · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-28 · Hoover Met - Jordan · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Fehr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-21 · Highland - Shea/Reidinger · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maggie Misner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · HMC - Richards · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alisha Mckay
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · Highland - Shea/Reidinger · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kirstie Ivey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Highland - Shea/Reidinger · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelli Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-08 · HMC - Richards/Bowden · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brantley Bowden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · Hoover Met - Jordan · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brantley Bowden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-26 · Highland - Shea/Reidinger · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Hinson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams104 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
100%
7W–0L · 71.7% of games
4.0
77.5%
62W–18L · 60.3% of games
4.5
39.7%
46W–70L · 48% of games
7.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 70.6% of games
8.5
44%
22W–28L · 49.9% of games
4.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 68.6% of games
8.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
142 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
57 matches
#1 Singles
11%
33 matches
#2 Singles
5%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams