← Search

Craig Bald

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 58W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history130 matches
L
2026-03-19 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with Mark Eriksson
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-24 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with Andrew Jaw
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-10 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with Mark Eriksson
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-01-22 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with Mark Eriksson
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-01-15 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with Dan Gralnek
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-01 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with HRISHIKESH TUPKAR
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-11 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with HRISHIKESH TUPKAR
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-02-13 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with Dan Gralnek
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-28 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with Dan Gralnek
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-21 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with HRISHIKESH TUPKAR
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-01-07 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson · #3 Doubles · with Andrew Jaw
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-12-05 · WI Tri Delta M Late Fall Doubles MALT Leung · #2 Doubles · with Jack Brody
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
60.9%
28W–18L · 53% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 39.1% of games
6.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 48.9% of games
7.0
50%
8W–8L · 51% of games
7.5
33.3%
6W–12L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe