← Search

Charlene Blake

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Guilford, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 14W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history35 matches
L
2026-07-06 · GF: String Sisters: Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Cummins
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-24 · GF: String Sisters: Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · GF: String Sisters: Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Cummins
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-04 · GF:Slice Sisters:Rieger/Tendler · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Haren
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-02 · GF:Slice Sisters:Rieger/Tendler · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martha Croog
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-19 · GF:Slice Sisters:Rieger/Tendler · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Leibiger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-01-26 · GF:Ad-Vintage:Rieger/Tendler · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-01-07 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-12-16 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carolyn McNally
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2024-12-03 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
L
2024-10-27 · GF:Ad-Vintage:Rieger/Tendler · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monica Parker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-08 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
38.2%
13W–21L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 66% of the time
#3 Doubles
66%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal