← Search

Roxanna Nemec

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Windsor, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
327 matches · 200W–127L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history327 matches
L
2026-10-08 · Pagendarm · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nikki Eyman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-01 · Pagendarm · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Dodson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Dempsey - #1 Combo with fries · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicole Brizan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-29 · Dempsey - #1 Combo with fries · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Ostlie
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · Dempsey - #1 Combo with fries · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Der
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-11 · RianJacques 40+8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bradley Jacques mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · RianJacques 40+8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ivan Kozliak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-31 · LaMoure 40+4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Snavely
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · Tetrault - Spin-derellas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy LaMoure
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Tetrault - Spin-derellas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy LaMoure
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · LaMoure 40+4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy LaMoure
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · LaMoure 40+4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Helder
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
40%
10W–15L · 46.5% of games
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 59.5% of games
3.5
80.7%
71W–17L · 62.1% of games
4.0
46.2%
36W–42L · 49.5% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 52.4% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.7% of games
7.0mixed
71.7%
38W–15L · 58.5% of games
7.5mixed
100%
9W–0L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 33.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
122 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
102 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
101 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams