← Search

Cody Garrard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Marietta, GA
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 10W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history31 matches
L
2026-10-16 · Laurel Park (Cody Garrard)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Candi Holmes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-09 · Laurel Park (Cody Garrard)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Candi Holmes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-2
L
2026-09-25 · Laurel Park (Cody Garrard)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Candi Holmes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-05 · Charlton Forge (Cody Garrard)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ishan Bhardwaj
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · Charlton Forge (Cody Garrard)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ishan Bhardwaj
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · Charlton Forge (Cody Garrard)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ishan Bhardwaj
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · Charlton Forge (Cody Garrard)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Kaga
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 5-7
L
2026-05-31 · Charlton Forge (Cody Garrard)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Phillips
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2023-12-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Turner
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 2-6
L
2023-12-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vish Birbal
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brett Witz
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-04 · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
31.8%
7W–15L · 42.8% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova