← Search

Burke Franklin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Newbury Park, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
273 matches · 172W–101L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history273 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Park & Wreck/Mack/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Hasquet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-30 · The 300's · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Stewart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-11 · The 300's · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Delia Holguin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-04 · Park & Wreck/Mack/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reanne Charuhas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-26 · Park & Wreck/Mack/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sami Leung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-13 · The 300's · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Delia Holguin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · Chief Peak · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Bell
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · WR Senior Ballers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ward
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · Chief Peak · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Conrad Vanhyning
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-31 · WR Senior Ballers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ward
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-25 · WR Low Tri Ballers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jose Mendoza
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · Chief Peak · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danny Everett
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
70%
77W–33L · 57.1% of games
4.0
35.7%
20W–36L · 45.9% of games
7.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.9% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games
0.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 65.8% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
77.6%
45W–13L · 59.4% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
55 matches
#1 Singles
15%
42 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert