← Search

Nancy Brown

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Woodstock, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 18W–66L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history84 matches
L
2026-08-11 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carissa Boles
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Brown
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-21 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Brown
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carissa Boles
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-24 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Chonka
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-13 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-06 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Brown
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-12-16 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Shattah
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 3-6
L
2025-12-10 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Wright
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-12-09 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-18 · Laurel Brook - Nancy Brown · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Smith
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
3.5
21.4%
18W–66L · 38.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#1 Singles
17%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe