← Search

Serene ZiCornell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
289 matches · 178W–111L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history289 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Wunderdogs · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brendan Fang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-26 · Faultless · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anya Prevallet
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carley Boyle championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy McDonnold championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Isabella Cox championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carley Boyle championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-10-10 · Faultless · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nina Escamilla Paradoski
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · Faultless · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Annie Brey
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-13 · Wunderdogs · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lang Hoang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · Combo No.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Renee de Lota
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-01 · Combo No.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carley Boyle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · Combo No.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jiani Feng
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 66.8% of games
3.5
80.6%
25W–6L · 65.7% of games
4.0
63.7%
65W–37L · 56.9% of games
4.5
57.6%
38W–28L · 54.7% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
8.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.6% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
66 matches
#1 Singles
10%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
16 matches
Singles
5%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer