← Search

Michelle Dickason

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 161W–82L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history243 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Return To Sender · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim McGinty
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-10-27 · Crowder/LF/Day3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Crowder
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-22 · Harris/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annmarie Wright
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-10-21 · Return To Sender · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim McGinty
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · Harris/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Baugher
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-08 · Harris/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Baugher
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · Lee(Huntley)/PH/40&over4.0W · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Baugher
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-28 · Harris/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Baugher
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-23 · Harris/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Baugher
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-22 · Crowder/LF/Day3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Crowder
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-10 · Lee(Huntley)/PH/40&over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Baugher
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-09 · Harris/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Baugher
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
81.8%
27W–6L · 62.2% of games
3.0
77.5%
31W–9L · 66.8% of games
3.5
54.8%
34W–28L · 54% of games
4.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 45.4% of games
5.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
76.9%
30W–9L · 60.6% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
26W–13L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
61 matches
#1 Singles
8%
19 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer