← Search

Linda DeFlaun

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Venice, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
10 matches · 1W–9L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history10 matches
L
2024-02-22 · Mission Valley Gibbs · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lou Ann Hippensteel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-01 · Mission Valley Gibbs · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Moriarty
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-11 · Mission Valley Gibbs · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with HelenAnne Quigley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2020-03-12 · Plantation Conway · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Hooper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
L
2020-02-27 · Plantation Conway · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jolie Walecka
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2020-02-20 · Plantation Conway · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Foubister
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2020-02-13 · Plantation Conway · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jolie Walecka
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2020-01-30 · Plantation Conway · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Celeste Brickman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2020-01-23 · Plantation Conway · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Goodrum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2020-01-16 · Plantation Conway · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jolie Walecka
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
10%
1W–9L · 30.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 60% of the time
#2 Doubles
60%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe