← Search

Nina Lo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Marlboro, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 65W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-02-12 · NJD: Chester Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Regan
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-4
L
2026-01-29 · NJD: Chester Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Farley
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-5
L
2025-12-16 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacylene Holloway
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-12-11 · Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Nied
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-05 · FALL SHORE/No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Walsh
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Default
2025-12-04 · NJD: Chester Tennis · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-01 · Team Favia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Walsh
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-10-31 · FALL SHORE/No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Boyle
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-24 · FALL SHORE/No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacylene Holloway
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-10-10 · FALL SHORE/No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Egan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-12 · FALL SHORE/No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacylene Holloway
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
Belle Fang / Michele Gioia
2025-08-01 · Get A Grip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Gorny championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 64% of games
3.5
69.7%
46W–20L · 61.3% of games
4.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
38 matches
#1 Singles
21%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova