← Search

Samantha Ng

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Danville, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 124W–76L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history200 matches
W
2026-10-29 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maurine Hagan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-26 · BLACKHAWK CC CW6.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dana Keating
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-20 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Junko Green
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-10-12 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Minh Cannon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-10-04 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elaine Horng
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-29 · BLACKHAWK CC CW6.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Fissel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-12 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lixia Lake
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bahurudeen Mohamed mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-09 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Fissel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-06 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Treppa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-05 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lixia Lake
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-02 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kris Anthony
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 59.3% of games
3.0
50%
18W–18L · 49% of games
3.5
44.4%
16W–20L · 47.3% of games
5.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 61.9% of games
6.5
50%
16W–16L · 53.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.6% of games
7.0mixed
82.1%
32W–7L · 61.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
40 matches
#1 Singles
10%
19 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal