← Search

Gillian McKenzie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pinecrest, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 151W–75L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history226 matches
L
2026-10-30 · Biltmore Slicers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolina Backes
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-22 · Biltmore Slicers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lily Coterillo
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-12 · Caamano (Biltmore Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paola Campanella
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-07 · Caamano (Biltmore Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lily Coterillo
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-30 · Biltmore Slicers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolina Backes
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-29 · Caamano (Biltmore Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paola Campanella
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-22 · Biltmore Slicers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolina Backes
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-14 · Caamano (Biltmore Tennis) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Silvana Caamano
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-09 · Caamano (Biltmore Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Markham
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-17 · TeamForman2 at Kendalltown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Kass
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-13 · TeamForman at Ron Ehmann · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Andrade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · TeamForman2 at Kendalltown · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beatrice Zapata
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
81.5%
44W–10L · 66.4% of games
3.5
63.5%
73W–42L · 55.8% of games
4.0
50%
7W–7L · 50.8% of games
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 49.6% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 52.6% of games
7.0
69%
20W–9L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
47 matches
#1 Singles
17%
38 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches
#4 Female Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal