← Search

Paul Singh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bossier City, LA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 25W–37L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history62 matches
W
2026-04-01 · Wood/18/3.0/M/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stefan Urian
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-04 · Wood/18/3.0/M/BTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stefan Urian
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-02 · Garcia/40/3.0/M/QTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Brown
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-23 · Garcia/40/3.0/M/QTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Doles
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-18 · Wood/18/3.0/M/BTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Boudreau
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-09 · Garcia/40/3.0/M/QTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thaddaeus Wallace
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-19 · Garcia/40/3.0/M/QTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with WILLIAM ALLRED
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-12 · Garcia/40/3.0/M/QTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Garcia
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-27 · Griffin/18/3.0/MXD/QTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Teague mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-20 · Griffin/18/3.0/MXD/QTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Rhodes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-04-22 · Griffin/18/3.0/MXD/QTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Dunn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-04-15 · Griffin/18/3.0/MXD/QTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Rhodes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 51% of games
3.0
35%
7W–13L · 47.4% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.4% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
2.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 66.2% of games
3.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 54.9% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer