← Search

Kwabena Ackie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 16W–23L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history39 matches
L
2026-10-08 · Courtyard Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mason Gross
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-13 · Courtyard Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Flores
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · Courtyard Dawgs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Flores
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · Courtyard Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allen Rubin
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-19 · Courtyard Dawgs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mason Gross
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-10-26 · Courtyard Mixed · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Kincaid mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Kincaid mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Kincaid mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Kincaid mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-03-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Caesar mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-09-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sam Kumar
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-09-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Kincaid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
30.4%
7W–16L · 48.2% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal