← Search

Karol Stevens

Highlands Ranch, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
239 matches · 167W–72L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Karol Stevens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history239 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Stephanie Wiesing championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Stephanie Wiesing championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Cyndy Besselievre / Karen Greenwood
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Stephanie Wiesing championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Shawn Blackwood championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Stephanie Gresh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · KC-RH RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · KC-RH RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Stephanie Wiesing championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Stephanie Wiesing championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · KC-RH RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Wiesing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Stephanie Wiesing championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · KC-RH RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Wiesing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 60.4% of games
3.5
90.7%
39W–4L · 70.6% of games
4.0
70.5%
55W–23L · 56.5% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 54.8% of games
7.0
100%
12W–0L · 64.7% of games
8.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 56.5% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
62 matches
#1 Singles
15%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams