← Search

Christopher Palmer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Evergreen, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 3W–25L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history28 matches
L
2025-06-16 · MVCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Holst
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-02 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Stephens
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-05-27 · MVCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chance Palmer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-05-19 · MVCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Kummer
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-08-20 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Gardner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-08-15 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Susan Tomlinson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-08-21 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ingrid Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-08-16 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ingrid Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2022-07-31 · NJ GREEN · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ingrid Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-07-10 · NJ GREEN · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ingrid Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2022-06-19 · NJ ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ingrid Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-14 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Coates
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 36.7% of games
5.5mixed
7.7%
1W–12L · 30% of games
6.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 21.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova