← Search

Betsy Mauk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westerville, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 32W–36L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history68 matches
L
2025-08-01 · Olympic 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Lukach
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-20 · Olympic 2 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Maher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-30 · Olympic 2 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Maher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
W
2024-07-24 · Elysium Early · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Early
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-06-05 · Elysium Early · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Russell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-11-16 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Heath
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-2
L
2023-11-09 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Heath
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-10-19 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Heath
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marsha Friedli
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2023-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diana Kline
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2023-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruth Crow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2023-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Augspurger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
6.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 56.2% of games
6.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 51% of games
7.0
36.1%
13W–23L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams