← Search

Nan Flanagan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simsbury, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 53W–40L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history93 matches
W
2025-11-12 · RFL:Love Hurts:Sullivan/ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Herbek
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-03 · RFL:Love Hurts:Sullivan/ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Sullivan
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-25 · RFL:All In:Ort · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Vaughn
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-22 · RFL:Love Hurts:Sullivan/ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcie Danton
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-04 · RFL:All In:Ort · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Vaughn
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-09-11 · RFL:Love Hurts:Sullivan/ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Herbek
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-17 · RFL:Summer Slayers:Walsh/Danton*NA · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Vaughn
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-07-16 · RFL:Summer Sweet Shots:Chapel/Kaplan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Meyers
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3
L
2025-07-14 · RFL:Summer Slayers:Walsh/Danton*NA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Walsh
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-10 · RFL:Summer Sweet Shots:Chapel/Kaplan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Follansbee
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-6
L
2025-07-07 · RFL:Summer Slayers:Walsh/Danton*NA · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Shiman
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-23 · RFL:Summer Slayers:Walsh/Danton*NA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Sullivan
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
59.1%
26W–18L · 53.2% of games
3.5
53.7%
22W–19L · 50.2% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
13 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer