← Search

Kaushik Nerusupalli

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 98W–112L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history210 matches
L
2026-10-01 · Nerusupalli/ATA Team/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chaitanya Korrapati
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-29 · Pinter/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael McGrew
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-23 · Nerusupalli/ATA Team/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chaitanya Korrapati
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-21 · Pinter/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael McGrew
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-17 · Pinter/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with CJ Simon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-09 · Pinter/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Allen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-03 · Nerusupalli/ATA Team/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chaitanya Korrapati
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sisco mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · Compton/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Brady
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaitlyn Witherell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sisco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-29 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Boehmler
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 64.5% of games
2.75
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
40.6%
13W–19L · 47.2% of games
3.25
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.8% of games
3.5
47.4%
18W–20L · 47.2% of games
4.0
22.2%
8W–28L · 36.9% of games
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.4% of games
6.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 50.5% of games
7.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 46% of games
2.5mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 63.3% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.2% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
31 matches
#1 Singles
12%
26 matches
#2 Singles
12%
25 matches
#3 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams