← Search

Laura Reilly

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westwood, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 18W–13L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history31 matches
L
2026-09-19 · W109:Sweet Shots:Phillips/Partello · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Nagle championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · W109:Sweet Shots:Phillips/Partello · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Nagle
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-4
W
2026-06-08 · W109:Sweet Shots:Phillips/Partello · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Nagle
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · W109:Sweet Shots:Phillips/Partello · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Nagle
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-28 · W109:Sweet Shots:Phillips/Partello, · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Klein
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-07-23 · W109:Sets in the City:DiVincenzo/Klein · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Kranseler
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-14 · W109:Sweet Shots:Phillips/Partello, · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Hiller
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-3
L
2025-06-23 · W109:Sweet Shots:Phillips/Partello, · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lizzie Phillips
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-06-19 · W109:Sets in the City:DiVincenzo/Klein · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Kranseler
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-06-16 · W109:Sweet Shots:Phillips/Partello, · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Nagle
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-3
W
2025-05-12 · W109:Sweet Shots:Phillips/Partello, · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Hiller
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-2
L
2024-06-24 · W109:Sweet Shots:Philips/Partello · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Nagle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 58.8% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 50.7% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal