← Search

Jim Griffeth

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 18W–23L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history41 matches
L
2026-09-26 · CC: Bell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Waxman championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-25 · CC: Bell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Waxman championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · CC: Bell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Weisman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-19 · WB: Dyl · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alan Dyl
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · WB: Dyl · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Timothy Herbert
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · CC: Bell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Gwizdowski
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · WB: Dyl · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larry Berman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · CC: Bell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Bell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · WB: Dyl · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terence Charles
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-08-14 · RP: Levesque · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gerald Levesque
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-29 · RP: Levesque · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Mable
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-23 · RP: Levesque · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Harvey Alberg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
41.7%
10W–14L · 44.3% of games
6.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.8% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer