← Search

Jiwon Paik

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fitchburg, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
267 matches · 134W–133L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history267 matches
W
Default
2026-10-05 · WI Combo 7.5W MALT Balistreri · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Ridgely
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-03 · WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT Atwood · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe Leung mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-02 · WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT Atwood · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe Leung mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-28 · WI Combo 7.5W MALT Balistreri · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abby Eddy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-09-21 · WI Combo 7.5W MALT Balistreri · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alisa Sleep
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · WI Combo 7.5W MALT Balistreri · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Esra Alagoz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-09 · WI Adult 40&O 3.5W MALT Quinn · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Warrick championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · WI Adult 40&O 3.5W MALT Quinn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Warrick championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · WI Adult 40&O 3.5W MALT Quinn · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Warrick championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W MALT Kosturova · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Lindley championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · WI Combo 7.5W MALT Balistreri · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Lindley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-24 · WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 Atwood · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Atwood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
67.5%
27W–13L · 59.1% of games
3.5
40.3%
25W–37L · 47.5% of games
4.0
40.6%
13W–19L · 48.9% of games
6.5
56.4%
22W–17L · 53.1% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.4% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.2% of games
6.0mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 57% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.7% of games
7.0mixed
32.4%
11W–23L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
99 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
73 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer