← Search

Sherri Brander

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Melbourne, FL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 9W–7L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history16 matches
W
2024-04-28 · Brevard/Lowe/55&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Grace Deming championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-02-23 · Brevard/Lowe/55&Over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Failla
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-02-02 · Brevard/Lowe/55&Over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ligia Moss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-01-26 · Brevard/Lowe/55&Over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Failla
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-01-12 · Brevard/Lowe/55&Over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laureen Lowe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-01-05 · Brevard/Lowe/55&Over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Failla
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
2021-11-17 · RCCB - Wells · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pandora Springer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2021-10-20 · RCCB - Wells · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Teresa Blair
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2021-10-06 · RCCB - Wells · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynne Schettino-DeFelice
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2021-09-15 · RCCB - Wells · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Teresa Blair
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2020-10-21 · Fee-Albrecht · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janis Mena
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2020-10-14 · Fee-Albrecht · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sandra Edwards
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56% of games
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer