← Search

Joshua Fretz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SEVERNA PARK, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
311 matches · 183W–128L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history311 matches
W
2026-10-24 · Atom Smashers 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andy Little
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
Default
2026-10-21 · Ball Strikers Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Yuscavage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-10-18 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordon Cochran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-18 · Atom Smashers 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Neal Nottrott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-17 · Atom Smashers 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tom Erdely
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-10-12 · Ball Strikers Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Riley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-07 · Sanders/Orders · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bryan Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-10-02 · Atom Smashers 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mike Kelly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-24 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with JD Zachry
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-20 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Lavinder
loading the estimate
4-5
L
2026-09-18 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ross Owens
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregory Fox
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.6% of games
4.0
66.4%
79W–40L · 57.7% of games
4.5
26.3%
5W–14L · 39.9% of games
7.5
60%
12W–8L · 52.2% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
54.2%
13W–11L · 53.1% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
28W–8L · 62.1% of games
7.5mixed
10%
1W–9L · 38.5% of games
8.0mixed
58%
29W–21L · 54.9% of games
8.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.6% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
162 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
60 matches
#1 Singles
15%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
23 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches
Singles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer