← Search

MARY HOLTZ

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 128W–93L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history221 matches
W
2026-10-30 · LCTA54/Felix/I’OnClub · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Audrey Cadwallader
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-23 · LCTA54/Felix/I’OnClub · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kitty Ijams
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-18 · LCTA39/Webster/ION · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Hiers
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-16 · LCTA54/Felix/I’OnClub · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kitty Ijams
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-10-15 · LCTA39/Webster/ION · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kitty Ijams
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-11 · LCTA39/Webster/ION · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Hiers
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-09 · LCTA54/Felix/I’OnClub · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kitty Ijams
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · LCTA39/Webster/ION · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Hiers
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-25 · LCTA54/Felix/I’OnClub · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Harrington
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-09-06 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debra Mulholland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · LCTA40/Webster-Strenck/I'On · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrea Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kari Roever
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 60.6% of games
3.5
52.1%
74W–68L · 50.5% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
63.4%
26W–15L · 54.7% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.4% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
30 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer