← Search

Catherine Owen

— year-end
87 matches · 45W–42L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Catherine Owen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
L
Christine Woods / Lauren Bloodworth
2026-09-09 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Toms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Slater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-05 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Libby Nabors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Micaela Cignetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-07 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-06 · Campbell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-05 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Eckelkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Heather Morgan / Brooke Smith
2026-04-30 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Tebbe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-27 · Wisley/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Tebbe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams44 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
70%
28W–12L · 61.1% of games
3.5
35.5%
11W–20L · 41.5% of games
6.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#1 Singles
13%
11 matches
#2 Singles
12%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert