← Search

Jared Matherne

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hammond, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 65W–70L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history135 matches
W
Default
2026-10-17 · Abrams-18/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jordan Spinosa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-11 · Matherne-Appe/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-STNCK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dallas Swan championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · Matherne-Appe/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-STNCK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Raggio championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-09-02 · Abrams-18/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jordan Spinosa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Fernandez mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Fernandez mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-06 · Abrams-18/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Appe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · Smith/18s/3.0/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mallory Skarica mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · Matherne-Appe/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-STNCK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Bowers
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · Smith/18s/3.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Fernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Smith/18s/3.0/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacey Schwab mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · Matherne-Appe/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-STNCK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Bowers
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
57.8%
26W–19L · 52.4% of games
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 40.6% of games
5.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 62.1% of games
6.5
33.3%
6W–12L · 43.9% of games
3.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.3% of games
3.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.1% of games
6.0mixed
23.5%
4W–13L · 36.9% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King