← Search

Margot Maurer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
TULSA, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 53W–89L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history142 matches
L
2026-10-25 · HCC/Torres 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tania Alavi
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-23 · HCC/Torres 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tania Alavi
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-17 · HCC/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Danielle McGriff
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-04 · 300/Cox-Plankenhorn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Cox
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · 300/Cox-Plankenhorn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taiana Mendez
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-01 · 300/Cox-Plankenhorn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yaramarie Munoz
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · HCC/Torres 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abby Klatsky
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-18 · HCC/Torres 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rhoda Wilburn
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-13 · HCC/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cameron Rosenthal
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · 300/Cox-Plankenhorn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Anderson
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · HCC/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Severance mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · HCC/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Lipori mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 44.1% of games
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 51.1% of games
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 62.2% of games
3.5
40%
20W–30L · 47.9% of games
4.0
25%
5W–15L · 42.7% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 49.3% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 52% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 42% of games
7.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 38.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.1% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#1 Singles
11%
16 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe