← Search

Supriya Prasad

Washington, DC
3.0C year-end 2025
52 matches · 20W–32L · seasons 2021–2023
Where Supriya sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Supriya is one of 1468 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 33% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Supriya has been 2.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.02.5202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Supriya has gone from the 25th to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 47.9% of games
3.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 41% of games
5.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
L
Margaret Bruno / Courtney Fuhrmann
2023-12-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Hartzell
+0.038better than expected — took 38% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Eva Liang / Mary Lind
2023-12-13 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Hartzell
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2023-11-29 · #1 Singles · 2.5
−0.022below expectation — took 0% of games against 25% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Corrine Pearson / Geneva Marcus
2023-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julie Brown
+0.021better than expected — took 100% of games against 75% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Lisa Jones / Christine LaBarre
2023-10-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Alcoser
−0.026below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Trish Metriyakool / Melissa Puopolo
2023-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hollie Millican
+0.016better than expected — took 63% of games against 55% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2023-10-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Francie Angelov
+0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
N/A
2023-10-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Hartzell
+0.106better than expected — took 100% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Raedene Counts / Kellye Ray
2023-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catherine Fadrowsky
+0.013better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-09-24 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alexandria Chang
+0.023better than expected — took 92% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2023-09-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Hartzell
+0.027better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2023-09-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aida Shirley
−0.026below expectation — took 0% of games against 27% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.