← Search

Brian Cain

— year-end
81 matches · 41W–40L · seasons 2021–2024

Captains: add Brian Cain to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
Matthew Winteregg / Mark Kaufman
2024-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ja Mee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Christopher Forrest / Hector Perez
2024-09-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dan Norton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
Ben Smith / Josh Quandt
2024-08-28 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Noah Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
John Cowan / James Cowan
2024-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noah Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Andrew Wagner / David Li
2024-07-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noah Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
Joel Valcarcel / Drew Lunsford
2024-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Vu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noah Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
Jeffrey Radke / Nicholas Wallace
2024-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noah Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
John Nichols / Preeti Dembla
2024-03-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Foldesi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lana Sutton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-10-10 · NIN FW M Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0: WW Cain · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Noah Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2023-09-30 · NIN FW M Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0: WW Cain · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Noah Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.2% of games
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 84.2% of games
3.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 52% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.1% of games
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 50% of games
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 44.1% of games
7.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 37.7% of games
6.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
21 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova