← Search

Michael Lane

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Jacksonville, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 18W–18L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history36 matches
W
2026-08-15 · Deercreek - Radel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jim Proctor
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Deercreek - Radel · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Craig Gambardella
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · Deercreek - Radel · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Neblett
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-18 · Deercreek - Radel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jim Proctor
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-24 · Huguenot Radel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Greg Burley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-14 · Huguenot Radel · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Craig Gambardella
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-23 · Huguenot Radel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian McIntire
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-26 · Huguenot Radel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Radel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-12 · Huguenot Radel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Craig Gambardella
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-06-29 · Boone Park - Bennett · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Bennett
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-22 · Boone Park - Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Fenech
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-06-08 · Boone Park - Bennett · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Fenech
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 48.1% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.5% of games
7.5
50%
8W–8L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal