← Search

Andrea Frickman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mystic, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 127W–74L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history201 matches
L
2026-10-25 · OSB: Martindale 4.5: Martindale · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eileen Griffin
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-24 · LS: Hochman Lyme Shores: Hochman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tamara Hochman
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-18 · OSB: Martindale 4.5: Martindale · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Moira Laidlaw
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6
W
2026-10-16 · LS: Frickman Mixed 8.0: Frickman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hong Guo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · LS: Hochman Lyme Shores: Hochman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Slopak
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-25 · LS: Lyme Shores Acers: Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Anastas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · MIS: Mighty Mystics: Frickman/Steppan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Onorato championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · MIS: Mighty Mystics: Frickman/Steppan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cari Anne Goodwin championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-21 · MIS: Mighty Mystics: Frickman/Steppan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Onorato championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-21 · MIS: Mighty Mystics: Frickman/Steppan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cari Anne Goodwin championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · MIS: Mighty Mystics: Frickman/Steppan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Grant
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · MIS: Mighty Mystics: Frickman/Steppan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cari Anne Goodwin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
62.5%
20W–12L · 55.6% of games
4.0
62.2%
61W–37L · 52.5% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
82.1%
23W–5L · 61.5% of games
8.0mixed
56.1%
23W–18L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
120 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
22 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer