← Search

Matthew Fitzsimmons

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 55W–41L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history96 matches
L
2026-09-30 · Mi.Ratliff18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Peter Flack
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-06 · Mi.Ratliff18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kenneth Lesher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · MCP.Ratliff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Lesher
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Mi.Ratliff18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Williamson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-09 · Mi.Ratliff18C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Todd Sprouse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Testa
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabe Jimenez
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · MCP.Ratliff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Francisco Burbano
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-21 · Mi.Ratliff18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Ratliff
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-21 · Mi.Ratliff18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Testa
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-15 · Mi.Ratliff18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Sprouse
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-05 · Mi.Ratliff18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nick Zelano
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
18W–6L · 64% of games
3.5
43.8%
14W–18L · 47.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 54.8% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova