← Search

Janet Boatwright

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Irmo, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 129W–108L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history237 matches
L
2026-10-26 · CTL55/Harris/GV · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colette Callender
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-22 · CTL40/Barber/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Buhrow
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-15 · CTL40/Barber/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betty Ragan
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-12 · CTL55/Harris/GV · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michiko Johnson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-08 · CTL40/Barber/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betty Ragan
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-01 · CTL40/Barber/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betty Ragan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-21 · CTL55/Harris/GV · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Bowens
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · LATA55/BOWENS/SSP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracie Ifkovits
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · CTL65/Dingle/GV · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Felecia Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-11 · CTL65/Dingle/GV · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Woodward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-06 · CTL55/PAIGE/GV · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colette Callender
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · LATA55/BOWENS/SSP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colette Callender
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 60.4% of games
3.0
75.3%
55W–18L · 59.8% of games
3.5
26.5%
18W–50L · 41.5% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.2% of games
6.5
55%
22W–18L · 51.7% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
59 matches
#1 Singles
9%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert