← Search

Bridget Goldman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 57W–22L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history79 matches
W
2026-10-23 · Team 18 Samuell Grand/Fletcher-Beach W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Lewis
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · Team 18 Samuell Grand/Fletcher-Beach W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Taylor
loading the estimate
6-0, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Samuell Grand/Mcgill-Fletcher W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Brunson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · Samuell Grand/Mcgill-Fletcher W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Herron
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · Samuell Grand/Mcgill-Fletcher W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Herron
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-06 · Samuell Grand/McGill W4.0F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Herron
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-10 · Samuell Grand/McGill W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Roberts
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-08 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Nammari
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-06 · Samuell Grand/McGill W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trisha Grimsley
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-20 · Samuell Grand/McGill W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Herron
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Nammari
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-16 · Samuell Grand/McGill W4.0F · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Evetts
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 67.2% of games
4.0
76.4%
42W–13L · 57.8% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#1 Singles
25%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#2 Singles
9%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert