← Search

Shane Browder

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Johns Creek, GA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 17W–19L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history36 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Deer Lake (Greg Jones)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Heybroek
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · Deer Lake (Greg Jones)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Magee
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-01 · Deer Lake (Greg Jones)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Magee
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-03-19 · Deer Lake (Greg Jones)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dendell Lawrence
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 5-7
W
2026-03-01 · Deer Lake (Greg Jones)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mel Griffin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-23 · Deer Lake (Greg Jones)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mel Griffin
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-02-08 · Deer Lake (Greg Jones)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Heybroek
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-18 · Mountain Oaks (Karmarcha Martin)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nakitia Johnson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-10 · Mountain Oaks (Karmarcha Martin)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Analise Moseley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-03 · Mountain Oaks (Karmarcha Martin)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Asha Henderson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-19 · Mountain Oaks (Karmarcha Martin)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerry O'Gorman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-12 · Mountain Oaks (Karmarcha Martin)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerry O'Gorman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 55.2% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 36.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal