← Search

Michelle Swiec

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Atlanta, GA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 23W–15L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-01-17 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Gricius
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-14 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Vanetta
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-11-22 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alia Bailey
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 6-4
W
2025-11-15 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsey King
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-07-20 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsey King championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-06 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alia Bailey
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-06-29 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsey King
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-06-22 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chiara Cavaggion
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-15 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsey King
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
Default
2025-06-01 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chiara Cavaggion
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-01-04 · Sandy Springs (Katelyn Peterson)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chiara Cavaggion
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-11-16 · Sandy Springs (Katelyn Peterson)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chiara Cavaggion
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 64.7% of games
4.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.1% of games
4.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer