← Search

Daniel Hewitt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Newark, DE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 47W–32L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history79 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim McCarley championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-24 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hayes
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim McCarley
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim McCarley
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim McCarley
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-10 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hayes
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-15 · Team Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Pat King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-07 · Team Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Giacomucci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hayes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hayes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hayes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hayes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 60.6% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43% of games
6.0
100%
6W–0L · 60.7% of games
7.0
64.1%
25W–14L · 57.8% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer