← Search

Prasad Govindarajan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plano, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 38W–66L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history104 matches
W
2026-09-19 · Team 3 High Point/Cooper M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Krolnik
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-23 · Team 4 Jeff Cooper/Kurinji Sathasivam 7.5M · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joshua Garza
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · Team 4 Jeff Cooper/Kurinji Sathasivam 7.5M · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Stover
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · Team 4 Jeff Cooper/Kurinji Sathasivam 7.5M · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with William Bonilla
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-19 · High Point/Trichel-Filistovich X8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aliaksandra Holub Filistovich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · High Point/Trichel-Filistovich X8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Feagin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · High Point/Trichel-Filistovich X8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nora Olthof mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · High Point/Cooper M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Krolnik
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · High Point/Cooper M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Tanguy
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · High Point/Cooper M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcelino Flores
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · High Point/Cooper M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kurinji Sathasivam
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · High Point/Cooper M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kurinji Sathasivam
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 58.7% of games
4.0
21.1%
8W–30L · 41.6% of games
7.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.3% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games
8.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 49% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 32.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
26 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova