← Search

Brad Daines

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 59W–45L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brad Daines to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Bryan Lawley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Bryan Lawley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · MSA 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Emerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-06-18 · MSA 18+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Ediss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · MSA 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pepi Ursillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-04 · MSA 18+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Emerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · MSA 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Lawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-21 · MSA 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Emerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-20 · MSA 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Emerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · MSA 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Maloney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-08 · MSA 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Emerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-30 · MSA 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Maloney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
63%
29W–17L · 56.3% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 38.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 63.7% of games
6.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 50.3% of games
7.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 45.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe