← Search

Dan Stembridge

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 82W–81L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history163 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Sal's Mixed Nuts 7.5 Combo Mix · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Newman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-17 · Sal's Mixed Nuts 7.5 Combo Mix · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Newman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-13 · 7.5 Combo at the Bury - Stembridge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Nelson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-08 · SCC TRI-Again - Stembridge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Stayin
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-01 · SCC TRI-Again - Stembridge · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Collins
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-30 · 7.5 Combo at the Bury - Stembridge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Zima
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · 7.5 Combo at the Bury - Stembridge · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Andy Gilbert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · 7.5 Combo at the Bury - Stembridge · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Nelson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · 7.5 Combo at the Bury - Stembridge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Zima
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-08-04 · SCC TRI-Again - Stembridge · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Stayin
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · 7.5 Combo at the Bury - Stembridge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Nelson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-28 · SCC TRI-Again - Stembridge · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Carnahan
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.7% of games
3.0
53.7%
29W–25L · 50.2% of games
3.5
8.7%
2W–21L · 35.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
86.4%
19W–3L · 59.2% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.4% of games
5.5mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 53.9% of games
6.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
38 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams