← Search

Chrissy Eberts

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 92W–95L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history187 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Hempfield Servivors - Evans · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Christman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-21 · Hempfield Servivors - Evans · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Christman
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-18 · Hempfield Hangen Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Crowley
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-14 · Hempfield Servivors - Evans · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marge Erb
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-02 · Hempfield Hangen Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Danowski-Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-28 · Hempfield Servivors - Evans · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Christman
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-09-23 · Hempfield Servivors - Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Evans
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · Hempfield Servivors - Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Evans
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-16 · Hempfield Servivors - Evans · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Miller
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-06 · Hempfield Topspin Theory - Eberts · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Alderman
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · Hempfield Topspin Theory - Eberts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Quyen Stehman
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · Hempfield Topspin Theory - Eberts · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Alderman
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 49.3% of games
3.0
63.8%
37W–21L · 56.7% of games
3.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 48.6% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.4% of games
6.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 49.3% of games
7.0
50%
13W–13L · 50.2% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
45.9%
17W–20L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 35.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer